(no subject)
And this is saying nothing about the article itself, which is about how the wicked and cowardly Democrats hope to steal the election through massive voter-registration efforts. Um... whuh... huh?
It really is an entirely different world, over there 'mongst the Reds.
I am nervous about the debates. I posted this confident ruh-ruh thing last week, but have since learned that the conventional wisdom stacks things mightily in Bush's favor; he has, they say, won every debate he's participated in. Kerry himself has said this.
GWB oozes with camera-friendly charisma, and will have a lot of soothing words for Themerican People, and a lot of winking smirks for his opponent, who I understood was almost late for the debate because he kept having to return to his office to put on a different color tie, wink, smirk, say no more.
A big difference between this and his previous debates, though, is that forty-five percent of his audience is guaranteed to meet his mugging with vein-popping rage. I don't know how or if this will affect that precious middle ten percent, them who's in the purple states. I pray that they can see though the smirking. I can't say. Very nervous.
Yes, I should be in bed now. Good night.
no subject
Wisconsin
By the way ... Since you've pointed to it earlier http://www.electoral-vote.com currently has Wisconsin as a 'Strong Bush' state (52% Bush, 38% Kerry, 4% Nader) -- I don't believe these numbers for a minute. Previous polls had this number MUCH closer (and usually in favor of Kerry) and I find it hard to believe opinion has shifted that much ... unless Kerry pissed Wisconsinites more than I thought by calling Lambeau Field (home of the Green Bay Packers) 'Lambert Field' during a speech he made in the state.
Nader, by the way, will NOT be on the Wisconsin ballot this year. I do expect a number of write-ins though, which will kinda suck because they're annoying to process at the end of the night (yes, I'm going to be a poll-worker at this election).
Re: Wisconsin
Re: Wisconsin
no subject
Still you have every right to be worried. My research shows that Bush could do exactly as you are suggesting - but more so - he could be completely undeserving of any positive result after the debate - making this all even far less "fair and balanced"...
Oh... and 45% of those in the debates will not be full of rage - last I read, it will be some Bush supporters, and mostly undecided voters (who could arguable be labeled the slowest SOBs on the face of the earth).
(no subject)
no subject
personally, i don't think he is going to come off as well as expected. he's not so much a thinking on the spot kind of guy.
(no subject)
(no subject)