prog | (no subject)

Today's featured Wikipedia article, on race is pretty interesting. It starts out with the (to me) surprising and somewhat suspect statement that many social scientists find the notion of race among humans as a pure and perhaps fundamentally flawed social construct, and then goes on to explain this point of view with great background and lucidity.

This is an example of me feeling richer after encountering an alternative to the conventional wisdom via Wikipedia; a counterexample would be the discussion page of the 9/11 article, which seems largely involved with a months-long (maybe years-long?) argument on whether or not it was a terrorist attack. (Buh?! Well, those against using the t-word argue that if Al Qaeda's principal motivation was not scaring people but the destruction of the WTC and Pentagon in order to remove their national utility, then it's more of a surprise military strike, with the thousands of innocent dead classifiable as wartime collateral damage. Buh?! Yeah, I know.)

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Hmm, I'm actually sort of surprised you hadn't come across that view of race before. It seems very common in anthro classes and it's arguably present in many history ones as well.

And as for the "terrorism" discussion: wtf?

Alas, I took no classes, and the only classes I took where race (or, more specifically, the effcts of racial prejudice) showed up as a topic -- World History and U.S. Gov't -- didn't go down this social-science path.

Er, took no anthro classes.