prog: (Default)
prog ([personal profile] prog) wrote2005-08-01 11:52 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Those WSJ stipple portraits are done by a human artist?! I've been seriously assuming all this time that they were a Photoshop filter's output.

[identity profile] jtroutman.livejournal.com 2005-08-01 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
the WSJ has been around a bit longer than Photoshop....

[identity profile] cortezopossum.livejournal.com 2005-08-01 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup... that's how they got pictures in the newspaper way back in the day (late 19th century... maybe earlier). I guess what I find a little surprising is that the Wall Street Journal still does it that way.

well DUH

[identity profile] toonhead-npl.livejournal.com 2005-08-01 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
While the artist often use the exact same pose from the picture they're working from, yup, always done by hand. You can't get that kind of control by running a PS filter over an image, and fixing the stippling would be a nightmare. (And she's not the only stipple artist they've used, either.)

Re: well DUH

[identity profile] magid.livejournal.com 2005-08-01 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
(Just picturing the giggles generated by "stipple artist" :-)

Re: well DUH

[identity profile] radtea.livejournal.com 2005-08-01 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You can't get that kind of control by running a PS filter over an image

I dunno about Photoshop specifically, but what the artist is doing can almost certainly be modelled as applying some fairly complex algorithm to the photo, so a sufficiently fancy filter could reproduce the effect within reasonable limits.