![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Half-Blood Prince
I finished Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and enjoyed it a great deal, probably the most of all the books in the series so far. (Yes, I've been having a good run of books and movies lately. I do dislike things sometimes, honest!)
The statute of limitations on this volume probably passed a while ago but just the same, let's hide my spoilers under a cut.
I began the book already aware about its big shocker, and I also knew that it seemed to have polarized all my Potter-reading friends. (I recall![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
leighjen saying she hated the ending with the fires of a thousand suns.) Since at the time I was putting up a modicum of spoiler suppression, I never asked for more details, but I assume that those on the hatey side were upset that Snape, who up until then had been presented as a complex and deeply conflicted character, seemed to flatten out into an out-and-out villain in the end.
I do not think it is so simple, though. After the climax, and right up through the last pages, the characters remain utterly confounded why Dumbledore trusted Snape, mentioning it frequently. This is clearly something that will be carried over into the next - and final - book for ultimate resolution. Also, did you notice that Snape was still giving lessons to Potter while he was fleeing Hogwarts, telling Harry why he was able to counter-hex all his spells and advising him how to improve? The tone seemed more teaching than taunting. Given the circumstances I found it weirdly touching, and maybe the most raw emotional scene between those two characters yet.
And finally, did you notice that when Dumbledore called for Snape after he and Harry landed on the tower, he didn't say why he wanted him? The readers are free to assume it's because he wanted Snape to provide an antidote for the terrible potion he drank at Voldemort's cache, but I think this is just more of the misdirection that Rowling just loves to do. Even when Snape finally appeared, Dumbledore only begged him "please".
I'm withdoctor_atomic that the apparent murder was all part of Dumbledore's plan, that he had worked out a situation with Snape - perhaps with Snape's conscious consent, perhaps not - that would involve him sacrificing himself in exactly the way that happened. The clues all point to a hell of a reveal about this event in the final book.
The statute of limitations on this volume probably passed a while ago but just the same, let's hide my spoilers under a cut.
I began the book already aware about its big shocker, and I also knew that it seemed to have polarized all my Potter-reading friends. (I recall
leighjen saying she hated the ending with the fires of a thousand suns.) Since at the time I was putting up a modicum of spoiler suppression, I never asked for more details, but I assume that those on the hatey side were upset that Snape, who up until then had been presented as a complex and deeply conflicted character, seemed to flatten out into an out-and-out villain in the end.I do not think it is so simple, though. After the climax, and right up through the last pages, the characters remain utterly confounded why Dumbledore trusted Snape, mentioning it frequently. This is clearly something that will be carried over into the next - and final - book for ultimate resolution. Also, did you notice that Snape was still giving lessons to Potter while he was fleeing Hogwarts, telling Harry why he was able to counter-hex all his spells and advising him how to improve? The tone seemed more teaching than taunting. Given the circumstances I found it weirdly touching, and maybe the most raw emotional scene between those two characters yet.
And finally, did you notice that when Dumbledore called for Snape after he and Harry landed on the tower, he didn't say why he wanted him? The readers are free to assume it's because he wanted Snape to provide an antidote for the terrible potion he drank at Voldemort's cache, but I think this is just more of the misdirection that Rowling just loves to do. Even when Snape finally appeared, Dumbledore only begged him "please".
I'm with
doctor_atomic that the apparent murder was all part of Dumbledore's plan, that he had worked out a situation with Snape - perhaps with Snape's conscious consent, perhaps not - that would involve him sacrificing himself in exactly the way that happened. The clues all point to a hell of a reveal about this event in the final book.
no subject
As far as the antidote thing goes, JKR has already said that SPOILER ALERT Dumbledore is really dead. But I guess his portrait will now appear in the headmaster's office and maybe offer advice? It's still not clear how those portraits relate to their original subjects.
no subject
I was imagining that the portraits were something like ghosts, not really vital enough to act as characters unto themselves. I'm sure he'll manage to get in a few lines anyway.