Entry tags:
The only comment I'll make
Ugh. I can't believe this is an AP headline.
"MIT coed with fake bomb 'art' arrested"
Problems here:
"MIT coed with fake bomb 'art' arrested"
Problems here:
- Co-ed is an outmoded term. I am pretty sure that the AP style guide explicitly stated this when I studied it over a decade ago. Do they make an exception for headlines? If so, what difference does it make what gender the person was?
- There was no fake bomb. It was a sweatshirt modified to have a light-up message, and by all accounts one that the person frequently wore. But every other headline is saying the same thing, and such was the best general knowledge in the first few moments after the arrest, so I can give this a reluctant pass. I'll be pissed if it sez this in tomorrow's print newspapers, though.
- I know that putting 'art' in quotes is ostensibly the headline writer saying that someone in the story is quoted as calling it art, but it ends up just sounding really snotty, as in my two year old kid could do that or whatever.
no subject
no subject
'MIT coed with "fake bomb art" arrested'
(as it really should) then it would be perfectly OK. After all, it's only a fake bomb according to a couple of people as well.
no subject
Seriously. I am always stunned when I see/hear this used.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I suppose the "fake bomb" bullshit is because of her being charged with having a "hoax device."
On the other hand, I think I know what to say for the next little while when people ask where I'm from: "Oregon." (See, I've been wondering how accurate that is any more, when I spent far more of my adult years in Boston than Oregon.)
no subject
(this is only pertinent because these two incidents occurred on the same day. One city over-reacted as is their norm, the other city did not)