The very existence of the name "HuckCain" makes it aesthetically necessary for them to team up.
Dunno how much it bothers me that they would be bad for science policy, as science policy hasn't been a notable priority of any president in my lifetime, I don't think, and I'm damned sure the only reason any of the previous incumbents since Carter haven't made any comments about evolution is because none of them have thought enough about the issue. So the choice is between apathy and hostility, which is less stark than one might like.
Hillbamma have teh warm fuzzies for science, but neither of them has a clue what any of it means, so they seem to me like managers who are always on about productivity and quality and worker empowerment while off-shoring jobs like there's no tomorrow.
US science policy matters less to me (who as a scurvy foreigner might even stand to benefit from the influx of researchers coming north...) than the restoration of the Constitution.
no subject
The very existence of the name "HuckCain" makes it aesthetically necessary for them to team up.
Dunno how much it bothers me that they would be bad for science policy, as science policy hasn't been a notable priority of any president in my lifetime, I don't think, and I'm damned sure the only reason any of the previous incumbents since Carter haven't made any comments about evolution is because none of them have thought enough about the issue. So the choice is between apathy and hostility, which is less stark than one might like.
Hillbamma have teh warm fuzzies for science, but neither of them has a clue what any of it means, so they seem to me like managers who are always on about productivity and quality and worker empowerment while off-shoring jobs like there's no tomorrow.
US science policy matters less to me (who as a scurvy foreigner might even stand to benefit from the influx of researchers coming north...) than the restoration of the Constitution.