Bridge!
I just now beat it 6 times in a row, and suspect that I can more or less continue to do so at this point. (Even though I still don't quite get how scoring works.) According to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
It has built-in network play which I haven't really tried yet. The one time I logged into it (as
zendonut
) a stranger asked me to join and I got skeert and run away. Maybe later.(A pause here to tip my hat to Freeverse, whose card games I have been playing for exactly 10 years now. In fact, I think their implementation of Hearts was the first shareware game I ever paid for, in the summer of 1994, a.k.a. the Summer I Did Nothing. I snailed them a postal money order, and they snailed back a floppy disk. How strange to think, nowadays!)
no subject
Indeed, I've been playing Freeverse bridge for a while as well.
[...]which I am led to understand is (as Mr. Morse once told me) WRONG! WRONG!! WRONG!!!
No disrespect to Mr. Morse here, but you see, that's symptomatic of the reasons I'm disinclined to play bridge vs. real people. There are two main reasons, actually:
1) People who stomp on you because you opened your mouth during the bidding and now are all pissed off because you don't know the BlackwoodJacobyAndMeyersCrosbyStillsNashAndYoung convention, even though they know you're a novice.
2) People who claim seven tricks at the end of a hand and clear the cards away immediately, even though they know you're a novice.
There seems to be a higher level of "well everyone knows that" in bridge than in other games I've played. If I could find a group of people with whom I wouldn't have to worry about the two above scenarios, I'd likely play on a regular basis.
no subject
And then they all let me redo my bid.
I will probably play with them again sometime and complain here if they continue to be stompy in non-tutorial games. :)