Entry tags:
On letting kids win
Somewhat confessional post I just made on a Board Game Geek list about ways to let your kids win at different games:
I agree with the spirit of this list but I beg caution and temperance from any parent wishing to employ it.
I remember my early childhood very well, and I am convinced that my ability to fully enjoy games was stunted and delayed by the fact that my parents and older brothers would always let me win at everything. After a while, they started to experiment with playing for real. I'd cry and carry on when I started to lose, and rather than teach me why losing didn't equate to some sort of existential failure , they quickly gave up and just let me win more.
What ultimately developed was the creature we all despise - a sore loser. My young peers quickly discovered that I was a terrible person to play games with, even though I always wanted to play games. When I was a little kid I'd try punching out anyone who out-Monopolied me, and even as late as college I'd storm away from a chessboard or even a video game when things were going poorly. I finally grew out of it by my mid-twenties, just in time to discover the secret world of non-Hasbro games.
I hope this doesn't come across as a "I blame my parents for everything" post. I love my family and realize that they were only trying to help me be happy. But since they didn't really care about games, figuring that they were mainly tools to mollify one's children, their use of them was well-intentioned but misguided.
Since the parents reading this know better than mine did about games, and have an active interest in instilling a lifelong love for them in their children, I urge that they be very careful when it comes to letting the little ones win. I encourage taking a controlling role in gameplay with your very young children, but I urge that you do so in order to let them learn about both winning and losing, and talk to them about what both conditions mean.
I agree with the spirit of this list but I beg caution and temperance from any parent wishing to employ it.
I remember my early childhood very well, and I am convinced that my ability to fully enjoy games was stunted and delayed by the fact that my parents and older brothers would always let me win at everything. After a while, they started to experiment with playing for real. I'd cry and carry on when I started to lose, and rather than teach me why losing didn't equate to some sort of existential failure , they quickly gave up and just let me win more.
What ultimately developed was the creature we all despise - a sore loser. My young peers quickly discovered that I was a terrible person to play games with, even though I always wanted to play games. When I was a little kid I'd try punching out anyone who out-Monopolied me, and even as late as college I'd storm away from a chessboard or even a video game when things were going poorly. I finally grew out of it by my mid-twenties, just in time to discover the secret world of non-Hasbro games.
I hope this doesn't come across as a "I blame my parents for everything" post. I love my family and realize that they were only trying to help me be happy. But since they didn't really care about games, figuring that they were mainly tools to mollify one's children, their use of them was well-intentioned but misguided.
Since the parents reading this know better than mine did about games, and have an active interest in instilling a lifelong love for them in their children, I urge that they be very careful when it comes to letting the little ones win. I encourage taking a controlling role in gameplay with your very young children, but I urge that you do so in order to let them learn about both winning and losing, and talk to them about what both conditions mean.
no subject
But no one would ever say something like that. I mean really. What possible context would require such a statement?
There are loads of mathematical concepts kids might not get, but you just say something like, "There's a way that subracting three from two can be made meaningful, but it's too complicated for me to explain" (not, note well, "it's too complicated for you to understand"--the concept may well be within the child's grasp, and who am I to say otherwise, and there may well be ways of explaining it to that child that would work, but if I have to fall back on this kind of answer I'm sure I don't know what they are.)
Why anyone would tell a kid (or anyone) something so transparently false as "you can't subtract three from two" is beyond me. At the very least you'd tell them, "You can't subtract three from two YET", and make that explicit, because it is basically a narrative hook to keep them wondering how to do it eventually.
no subject
Grade school. Seriously, that's what teachers say. Your paraphrases may be reasonable, but they aren't what's used.
no subject
And for instances where you can't think of how to make an answer honest, I agree with radtea. Just tell them you can't explain it. That works if you're just too tired, as well. Kids are exhausting with their "whys" and "how comes" so it's fair to tell them you'll answer the question later. And that reduces the temptation to lie to make things easier.
Of course, I don't have kids. But I do enjoy the back seat parenting. :)