(no subject)

[prog]

In a crafty mood this evening, so made an SVG card deck. Note that clicking that link will probably make one of two things happen for you, at least if your computer it set up like mine: you'll get a cascade of nigh-meaningless XML (if you don't have Adobe's SVG Viewer plugin installed) or (if you do) you'll see something that looks like a deck of cards, except with hollow squares replacing every suit symbol. This is because I used fonts for every symbol on every card; the only manually-defined shape was the border rectangles. Alas, most fonts don't support the Unicode "miscellaneous symbols" space I plucked these glyphs from. So, yes: like everything else I try to make, it's broken because I'm just too cutting-edge.

Actually, Squiggle renders them pretty nicely, so I took a couple of screen-samplings from that.

There actually was a practical point to this exercise, viz: remove all the <use> elements from the document, and you got yourself a nice, non-displaying library of SVG symbols, ready for manipulation by strange & alien forces, such as ECMAScript. Can you guess that I did this in order to take a break from cleaning up the Volity paper, which is about a remarkably similar topic?

Shocked and appalled that the month is more than half over. I'll try to have this paper done by XMas.

Comments

[prog.livejournal.com]

Oo, oo, that's great. What'd ya use, Adobe SVG Viewer 3.0 w/ Windows?

I'm really curious about what font it uses for both the suit-symbols (which several fonts on my system can draw) and the chess-icons (which only one font can... and when I try to invoke it by name in the SVG document, my SVG Viewer picks one with a similar name, but not the right one. Gah.) I'm guessing that a better-programmed viewer knows about fonts that can draw special characters, and switches to them when they show up, but I'm not sure...