![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It was a warm summer day, and so I got to see yet more instances of a certain fashion (trend|accident) among the young ladies. I dunno, man... am I strange for finding this sort of display quite unflattering, regardless of bodytype (or gender, for that)? I mean, I felt active embarrassment for these people. I'd like to think that I actually have a point here and am not just being "old", like someone who grew flustered at a flashed ankle back in apocryphal times. Enh.
I heard Bill Maher on Fresh Air last night and he was great and I am now kicking myself for forgetting to try Tivoing last friday's season premiere of Real Time (coz HBO reruns it a lot). Maybe tonight. Anyway, everything he said was balm to my soul, still raw from that morning's revelation of the financial-building bullshit. He has a gentle way of putting things, and I enjoyed hearing him speak of the virtue of veteran presidents (he voted for Dole in 1996). I cringed when he made a throwaway remark on The Stupidity Of The American People, which reminded me why I tossed out my Real Time Tivo season pass before. (To his credit, I have never heard him say "sheeple", which is a direct verbal interface to the off-switch in my brain stem, just like in Snow Crash.) I'll still give him one more one more one more chance.
Today's Doonesbury is strange... it's as if Bill Amend suddenly learned to draw. OH SNAP
Tivoed O'Grady on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Not enough to form an opinion yet, but I'm unfortunately pessimistic about my ability to actually like it. Firstly, it seems to be a children's show, with humor less complex than that found in Home Movies. "Worse", it sports a high-school setting, which even in a bizarrely drawn cartoon depiction makes me feel squirmy. Maybe as an ex-con would feel watching a show about prison, or something. I dunno. Anyway, this show is going to have to labor hard to win me over. And I don't think it will labor hard for me, because I'm not its audience. But we'll see.
wow
Date: 2004-08-04 07:19 am (UTC)Then again, this one had better uniforms and the set itself was more detailed.
The middle two were actually pretty good, they just weren't comedies. It's hard to do Henry V and not be compared to Branaugh (which would be part of my complaint about Much Ado -- hell, I was wishing for Michael Keaton as the local constable, instead of AnnoyingWoman). It's hard to do Hamlet and not compare it to, well, everyone.
Re: wow
Date: 2004-08-04 08:34 am (UTC)For instance, the problem with Henry V wasn't that it wasn't Branagh; the problem was that the lead, Anthony Rapp, just wasn't very good. He was good in Rent, he was good in You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown, but either Shakespeare didn't agree with him, or acting outside a musical didn't. But he played Henry with no subtlety, and delivered most of the monologues at a single emotional pitch, having started out at a point too high for him to build.
And the Scottish Play (not Hamlet) had a number of problems as well. (For what it's worth, I'd never seen a production before, never even read it all the way through, so this has, again, nothing to do with comparison.) The vision wasn't very well-executed, as if they'd picked an idea ("Let's compare them to Juan and Evita Peron!") and then hadn't committed to it wholeheartedly. As I recall, we adored the lead's performance, but found the Lady to be stiff, and many of the other supporting actors to be kind of sub-par.
Re: wow
Date: 2004-08-04 09:07 am (UTC)and this from someone who usually just views theatre as entertainment. it's a pretty safe bet that if
butt cleavage
Date: 2004-08-04 07:44 am (UTC)I cannot wait for low-rise pants to go out of style; I'm annoyed that it is nigh impossible to find cargo pants with a waistband at, well, waist level.
O'Grady
Date: 2004-08-04 08:39 am (UTC)I don't like it myself. I'll try again, but blech for now. I'd'a mentioned that, but by then I'd discovered you prefer the
MOVE CAR
Date: 2004-08-04 10:43 am (UTC)at 13:30 -f ./pageme
or some such, where pageme was a shell of 'mail' sorts... I'm sure you could even make the 'at' job be the script. I just simplified it by calling the script instead of writing it all the time.
Well, enough geek out. HTH
directional
Date: 2004-08-04 02:55 pm (UTC)Thanks for the warning re: asscleavage. I think it looks like people forgot to check the mirror before they went out, but I am getting old.
(ps. hi!)