(no subject)
Oct. 25th, 2006 11:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
progHeh heh, pages upon pages of people going No... NO! Aaaaaagh you're all wrong shut up about the .999... thing. This is worse/more amusing than the time that the Monty Hall problem was AOTD.
I find it interesting that the text of the article actually predicts the belief-path the doubters take... when faced with simple and easily graspable proofs, they change their minds and state that obviously this means that the number system is broken.
I find it interesting that the text of the article actually predicts the belief-path the doubters take... when faced with simple and easily graspable proofs, they change their minds and state that obviously this means that the number system is broken.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 05:33 pm (UTC)And like the Monte Hall problem, the failure of people to understand is really helped along by lousy pedagogy.
The Wikipedia article does a relatively good job of presenting the proof, but it would be far better if it started with a paragraph discussing multiple representations of numbers as a common occurence in all notational systems, so instead of seeming needlessly and pointlessly counter-intuitive when first introduced the equality of 0.999... and 1 would be presented to the reader as a previously unnoticed instance of a perfectly familiar and ordinary phenomenon.