prog: (Default)
[personal profile] prog
I am starting to suspect that you cannot send an MSN Messenger IM to someone unless both you and the intended receiver are on each others' contact lists. Is this true?

Date: 2009-01-11 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xartofnothingx.livejournal.com
yup - msn messenger is bullshit that way :)

Date: 2009-01-11 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog.livejournal.com
Poopy. This drops a wedge in part of my Planbeast plans.

I find that I _can_ fire off messages to strangers if I'm using the messenger app on Windows, but that seems to be the only exception so far.

Date: 2009-01-11 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] popecrunch.livejournal.com
Any reason Planbeast itself can't have a messenger account, with a requirement that users of the service add it to their contact list?

Date: 2009-01-11 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog.livejournal.com
Sadly, yes - MS limits the number of contacts that any single user can have. We could do some terrible hackery to get around this, but I don't wanna go there.

I'm seeing if I can't get around this with some Perl wizardry, but I'm prepared to drop this as a launch requirement if I can't get it working soon. It's quite literally a bell/whistle.

Date: 2009-01-11 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocorisu.livejournal.com
I think... but am not sure... that it's a per-user option. I certainly USED to receive spam over MSN until I set an option saying "accept messages only from people on my contact list". I'm not sure what the deal is where sending messages is concerned.

Date: 2009-01-11 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog.livejournal.com
It's starting to look like each MSN account has a whitelist, as you say, and that it's activated by default on brand-new accounts. So what I want to do is definitely possible, but the app will have to instruct users to either add Planbeast as an MSN contact, or turn off their whitelist.

Kind of stinky, because this dooms us to getting bug reports forever from users who didn't read the directions complaining that they never got their IMs. But, better than nothing.

Date: 2009-01-11 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocorisu.livejournal.com
Perhaps, at sign up time, if you tell it to send messages at all it will immediately send you a confirmation code so it can make sure the messages are getting through. Without the confirmation code it will refuse to do IM notifications?

Date: 2009-01-11 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog.livejournal.com
Oh, I'm just moaning. The bug reports would have to be getting truly chronic before I'd resort to more work. :)

I'm more grumbly about putting more work on the user's plate, since 90 percent of them will look at the instructions and say "Meh, never mind." But that's a worst-case of them voluntarily not using a feature, which is acceptable to me.

Date: 2009-01-11 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocorisu.livejournal.com
Haha, moaning is an OK solution too :)

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 17th, 2025 05:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios