Klingon propaganda video
Oct. 26th, 2009 12:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is nice:
Interesting pattern develops here, if this is a viral for the next J.J. Abrams Trek film (which it almost surely is, since it looks too polished, and its credit roll is too absent, to be a fan video). It follows the same precedent for superhero-story reboots set by the Nolans' Batman films: in the first installment, pit the hero against a canonical but somewhat lame villain. This keeps the focus on how you've revitalized the hero - or, in Trek's case, the heroic ensemble. If that goes over well, then you can sustain fan-glee by rolling out the arch-nemesis for part two.
rikchik points out to me that the latter-day Dr. Who TV series follows this pattern as well. The first Eccleson episode had him shining as he dealt with the obscure-but-canonical Autons, and they waited a few episodes before the ol' Daleks showed up to steal his spotlight away.
Edit Oh, the glyphs at the end are totally a URL passed through a simple latin1-to-klingon-character cipher. I am too lazy to figure it out though.
Edit 2 OK, fine: it goes here. (Ripped from an IO9 comment. whee...)
Interesting pattern develops here, if this is a viral for the next J.J. Abrams Trek film (which it almost surely is, since it looks too polished, and its credit roll is too absent, to be a fan video). It follows the same precedent for superhero-story reboots set by the Nolans' Batman films: in the first installment, pit the hero against a canonical but somewhat lame villain. This keeps the focus on how you've revitalized the hero - or, in Trek's case, the heroic ensemble. If that goes over well, then you can sustain fan-glee by rolling out the arch-nemesis for part two.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Edit Oh, the glyphs at the end are totally a URL passed through a simple latin1-to-klingon-character cipher. I am too lazy to figure it out though.
Edit 2 OK, fine: it goes here. (Ripped from an IO9 comment. whee...)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:04 pm (UTC)...no tribbles though. That would have been fun to see the troops skeet shooting them or something.
Also -- who said the future of animation will kill 2-D :)
...though, does Flash count?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:26 pm (UTC)(I'm also sure there that "2-D animation has been REBORN!!" headlines will nonetheless continue to appear for as long as animation exists as an art form. :) )
no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 09:41 pm (UTC)Thank you for the biggest laugh I've had all day!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-26 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 01:02 am (UTC)The web site was appropriate because it took over my computer and I had to ctrl-alt-delete end-process to stop.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-27 02:56 am (UTC)I was tickled that they started with the Autons, because the Autons were the only Doctor Who monsters ever to actually scare me in childhood. The first time I ever saw the show on PBS, it was one of the Pertwee Auton serials, and I found the idea of mannequins with guns hidden in their hands too disturbing to go back and watch that Doctor Who thing again for quite some time.
Since the first serial broadcast in America was "Spearhead from Space", it's quite possible that I was freaked out by the very first appearance of Doctor Who on American TV.