prog: (Default)
From [livejournal.com profile] rserocki: Biologists are making progress in isolating why calorie restriction extends animals' lifespans. This is encouraging news.

I thank the CR community for helping to keep life extension in the headlines, making news like this more visible, but their implementation is not one for most people. (Understatement.) My interest in CR stops at being mindful to avoid eating when I'm not actually hungry - which is good, but it isn't even scratching the surface of what its real practitioners do. (Which is, basically, to avoid eating when they are actually hungry.) I admire and support their commitment, and I am sure they're right about all the side benefits of their koo-koo diet (such as out-of-whack hormone generation giving them a feeling of continual elation), but still I think I'll hold out for the pill version.
prog: (khan)
I need a life-extension icon. I'll use Shatner for now because he's a rather spritely 75-year-old, isn't he. (Yes, he's only 50 in this picture, but do you deny that he's still got it?)

From BoingBoing, some Aubrey de Grey stuff: a brief text interview, where he interestingly pooh-poohs the effectiveness of CR in humans, and the full video of a presentation he gave about how he'd like to fight aging, starting with the prerequisite fight to raise awareness of aging as something that can be fixed.

It's frustrating that my plan to be rolling in ca$h money by now hasn't really panned out because I had been planning from the start to pour a lot of it into things like SENS and the MPrize. I'll keep trying.



It seems that "life extension" is the term on the rise for this whole thing. I like it better than "immortality", which has the air of divine unattainability baked into it, or "clinical immortality", which sounds too, erm, clinical. I'll have to go adjust my LJ tags to match, sometime.
prog: (monkey)
Blah blah. I think I'm posting about this slightly more than I care about it, but it seems I hooked onto the topic just as it's starting to become really visible, so here we go.

CR made the NYT. One is tempted to speculate about this diet getting fad-famous, but I just don't think so; it's proponents seem to treat the weight loss as merely a side effect of their real goals, and I don't think these are goals that tons of everyday people would be willing to starve themselves over, especially with that whole not-actually-proven-with-humans wrinkle.

It's probably getting more attention due to the mix of "Cool, more research into living longer" and "OMG, look, freaks!" The photographer did a good job contrasting that guy's handsome face with his alarmingly scarecrow physique. The monkeys are cute though. Who's a hungry monkey.
prog: (coffee)
OK, I admit it, [livejournal.com profile] aprils_cr_diary is kind of dopey. I will give her the benefit of the doubt and assume that she isn't trying to come across as obnoxious as she sometimes appears, but I have to say that anyone who describes a large object as "blank-ing[sic] huge" is undeniably from a different planet than mine.

On the other hand I'm going to keep her on my flist for a while, because one thing I discovered quickly about the CR subculture is that it's full of hardcore nerdz, and as such any writer within it emit links to interesting stuff that lay at the intersection of foodiness and hackerliness. Here's a couple of things I have found today:

* CRON-O-Meter is a Mac/Win application intended to be primarily useful to CR dieters, but I think it's more generally interesting than that. It's a nice front-end to several open databases of food items' nutritional information, and gives you an easy way to track how well you're meeting a recommended daily intake of calories, fats, carbs, vitamins and minerals, so long as you're willing to punch in everything that you gobble down.

This begs the question: whose recommendation? Whoever it is, they actually think that, given my age and height, I'm deficient in all of those stats (even calories), except for carbs, of which I am eating enough to fell a wildebeest. Or something.

* Slashfood is exactly what it sounds like: a foodie version of Slashdot, except much nicer looking, and I didn't want to chuck my display out the window based on any of the headlines. I dunno if I'll actually read it regularly but I appreciate that it exists.

CR people

Oct. 29th, 2006 01:49 pm
prog: (Default)
Story from New York Magazine about a Calorie Restriction diet subculture. That is, people who eat as few calories per day as they can, carefully measuring out exactly the nutrient quantities their body needs and not a scrap more, with the hope that it will add (all things being equal) decades to their lifespan.

I had heard about the experiments with lab animals, where it's proven to work, but didn't know that people were doing this. I imagined that nobody would want to live in a state of constant hunger.

This sounds exactly like the sort of thing I'd jump into wheeee and then forget about two days later. Still quite intriguing.

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 17th, 2025 07:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios