No monkey for you
Dec. 6th, 2007 01:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Golden Compass is getting knocked by critics, according to Rotten Tomatoes. Even generally positive reviews (like the one in the Globe today) are calling it badly paced, feeling more like it's rushing through the book's story rather than adapting it. This is the reason I took a pass on seeing the most recent Potter pic, and I am not likely to bother with this one either. Too bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-06 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-07 03:24 pm (UTC)I'm not big on the books because Pullman's writing falls flat on my ear. Previews of the film look like the director has brought the richness that other people see in Pullman's world to life, so those of us who don't grok his style can finally get in on the fun.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-07 04:33 pm (UTC)http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071206/REVIEWS/712060302
no subject
Date: 2007-12-07 11:05 pm (UTC)Scanning through the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, The Golden Compass appears to have gotten some very favorable reviews from people I respect, if not necessarily agree with. That's good enough for me. I'm not real likely to see the movie soon anyway, but I wouldn't write it off on the basis of the Tomatometer score.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 07:04 pm (UTC)Neither of us had read any of the books, so that may have contributed to the enjoyment. We went in with no preconceived notions. There were definitely places where I felt like I wanted more backstory, but I knew that reading the book would eventually provide it.
I dunno, but it seemed pretty cool to me. Definitely worth seeing in the theater.