iPad

Apr. 4th, 2010 12:20 pm
prog: (Default)
No, I don't have one. But I am sold on one, where I wasn't in January, and will almost certainly buy one this year sometime. (The lowest-capacity 3G model looks most attractive to me.)

As [livejournal.com profile] xach recently noted, and many others have agreed, the iBooks app is beautiful. This alone would sell me on it. Even given the itty-bitty screen and sparse interface, the existence of Kindle for iPhone instantly made me fall head-over-heels sold on reading (and buying) books electronically. I have easily spent over $100, maybe $200 on downloaded electronic books in the past few months, and have many more freebies as well. The iPad's larger and richer interface is clearly much closer to the format that books want to be read in, and I in turn want to make my books happy.

I have read (or am still reading) all the books that I have bought this way. This is not the case with my personal library of paper books. And here is why: my library of electronic books is, in its entirely, in my pocket at all times. Wherever I am, when I want to read something, I can summon one of my books into my hand. It is real magic, friends.

But you know what really puts a fire in my heart over this? The fact that one of the first things I will do after acquiring an iPad is purchase a subscription to a daily newspaper. I am looking forward to reading a paper again, a real, smart, edited daily paper. I don't know which one yet, but any of the ones that have survived for this long (counting from when Craig's List pinched off their air supply) and which look and feel gorgeous on the iPad will do.

I last subscribed to a paper 15 years ago, when I was still a journalism student. Yes, thank you, I am well aware that nothing's been stopping me from subscribing to a newspaper since then. But a device like the iPad, to me, seems like such a more correct delivery vehicle for a daly paper than, um, paper. The reasons go from basic cleanliness and convenience to the potential for brilliant interactivity that a smart periodical with a modicum of subtlety can accomplish.

This device will help make me smarter, is what I'm saying, and that is very exciting.
prog: (doggie)
Noted it in the Appleseed blog, but let me say it again, given news about yet another dead app: I cannot imagine why any developer, other than either nothing-to-lose hobbyists or huge companies with sufficient legal clout, would ever want to write an iPhone application.

That Apple can - and has been lately demonstrating its ability to - shitcan all your work only after you've pushed it all the way through its 1.0 release is utterly outrageous, especially since the iPhone OS doesn't allow software to be published through any other route. Apple may have manually rubbed out only a handful of apps lately, but in doing so they've obliterated countless more, as developers figure en masse that they've got better things to do with their time than gamble that Apple won't randomly decide to neutralize weeks or months of work.
prog: (doggie)
I am totally in-line for a new iPhone when Apple lifts the expected veil on the device's second generation next month. My little Sony Ericsson brick is four years old, covered in interfaces that nobody supports any more, and works so spottily that I've been asking clients who wish to have a voice meeting if we could use Skype instead. I tell them that I'm holding out for the new iPhones, rather than just picking up a replacement. They understand.

Hm... I actually told myself (and anyone in earshot) from the start that I'd be in as soon as it hit its first major revision, so in that way I'm kind of pleased with myself for holding out so long.
prog: (Default)
Call me Cory if you must, but I found the lead graf of this story about Apple's latest response to iPhone hackers very disappointing.
“It’s a cat-and-mouse game,” said Steve Jobs. “We try to stay ahead. People will try to break in, and it’s our job to stop them breaking in.”
And by "people" he means "customers". I mean, by definition. The iPhone is a hunk of hardware that has been purchased for hundreds of dollars each by the people in question; there's no other way to obtain one. And Steve Jobs, who happily took their money, stands here and baldly states that it's now Apple's job to thwart their own customers against using their purchases as they like.

Gawd. I dunno.

And this isn't even getting into the conventional wisdom that these insulting maneuvers are all futile anyway, since any sufficiently charged-up hacker base will always circumvent your barriers within moments of their release...
prog: (what_you_say)
I just got an email from someone at Apple informing me that the MIME type used by the first SVG document I ever made is out of date. What the.

He was testing an upcoming Safari release's new SVG-rendering capabilities, but that's not the point. How the hell he found the document, that's the bigger issue. Are there so few SVG documents on the Web that that one will get pulled into a "let's see how this handles the real world" testing suite?

(I make no apologies for the catchphrase seen in the document. It was all the rage when I created it.)
prog: (doggie)
Hey, I don't remember that being there. (Look closely.) (Yes, it's in the movie version, too.) (From Derek Vadala)

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 8th, 2025 08:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios